Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Patch kustomize for GPUs to provision in regions without zones on Azure #1888

Merged

Conversation

bdattoma
Copy link
Contributor

@bdattoma bdattoma commented Oct 3, 2024

In order to support provisioning of GPUs in some regions of Azure where availability zone are not present we need to skip removal of "zone" key

Notes:

  • it is forcing the replicas to 1 because in case there are no zones, the machine set will get created with n > 1 nodes
  • atm among the regions we use, west us is the only one without zones

PR validation (on local CI):

  1. provision in westus region: PASS
  2. regression: provision in eastus2 region: PASS

@bdattoma bdattoma self-assigned this Oct 3, 2024
@bdattoma bdattoma added the needs testing Needs to be tested in Jenkins label Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Robot Results

✅ Passed ❌ Failed ⏭️ Skipped Total Pass %
547 0 0 547 100

@bdattoma bdattoma marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2024 11:25
@bdattoma bdattoma changed the title Patch kustomize for regions without zones in azure Patch GPU kustomize for regions without zones in azure Oct 3, 2024
@bdattoma bdattoma changed the title Patch GPU kustomize for regions without zones in azure Patch kustomize for GPUs to provision in regions without zones on Azure Oct 3, 2024
@bdattoma bdattoma added verified This PR has been tested with Jenkins and removed needs testing Needs to be tested in Jenkins labels Oct 3, 2024
jstourac
jstourac previously approved these changes Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jstourac jstourac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Don't have thorough knowledge here, but seems good.

Don't like those missing new-lines warnings, though 😁

@bdattoma
Copy link
Contributor Author

bdattoma commented Oct 3, 2024

/lgtm

Don't have thorough knowledge here, but seems good.

Don't like those missing new-lines warnings, though 😁

for some reasons adding a new line in my local branch of the file, doesn't mark the files as changed wrt remote branch..I tried to fix the new line error but I prefer not spending more time on it now. let's see if the warning disappears after the last sync I did

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 3, 2024

@bdattoma bdattoma merged commit be27db5 into red-hat-data-services:master Oct 3, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
verified This PR has been tested with Jenkins
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants